Is There Any Major Difference Between InnerHTML And Using CreateTextNode To Fill A Span?
Solution 1:
Of course. createTextNode
will escape any strings and show them as they are, while innerHTML
could render html-like strings into a DOM. If you don't want that (unless you are sure the text contains no unescaped tags, e.g. when assigning a literal directly), you can use textContent
(or innerText
for IE).
Yet I'd recommend createTextNode
, because all browsers support it equally without any quirks.
Solution 2:
Doing some research online, here's what I've found. This should cover it at a high level:
elem.createTextNode(text) and elem.textContent = text do the exact same thing (src: https://javascript.info/task/createtextnode-vs-innerhtml)
While textContent returns the full text contained in a node, innerText returns only the visible text contained in the node. (src: Difference between textContent vs innerText)
Solution 3:
My understanding is that certain manipulations of innerHTML remove all bound events, so using createTextNode is preferable.
Post a Comment for "Is There Any Major Difference Between InnerHTML And Using CreateTextNode To Fill A Span?"